9 Comments
Jun 25Liked by Roman Bystrianyk

Patrick Jordan transcribed both volumes of Edgar Crookshank's 1889 History and Pathology of Vaccination. I highly recommend both of them. Be warned that he is not backward about being forward in his judgement of this atrocity.

https://www.lulu.com/shop/patrick-jordan/history-pathology-of-vaccination-volume-1/paperback/product-22132623.html?page=1&pageSize=4

https://www.lulu.com/shop/patrick-jordan/history-and-pathology-of-vaccination-volume-2/paperback/product-22132600.html?page=1&pageSize=4

Expand full comment
Jul 4Liked by Roman Bystrianyk

This sounds all too familiar. I have been against and any and all vaccines for over a decade. I remember thinking the Covid vaccine was significantly worse than any other. I am not so sure about that anymore. How much healthier might we all be had we never fallen for this witchcraft.

Expand full comment

Reminds me of “The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.”

‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭4‬:‭1‬ ‭NIVUK‬‬

Expand full comment

There were attempts at inoculation in the colonies as early as the 1740s, if I recall correctly, with town council meeting discussions and parties on both sides. Smallpox.

Expand full comment
author

The notion of inoculating with pus from smallpox victims started in England in the 1720s. Jenner slightly modified it in 1798, using pus from animals instead.

Expand full comment

Bridenbaugh, in Cities in the Wilderness, provides some detail about the colonies, e.g., the system of inoculation proposed in 1721 by Cotton Mather and Dr. Zabdiel Boylston. The debate has been ongoing in North America since the earliest times. This book is searchable: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.59788 Many instances of inoculation and smallpox, with dates and sources.

Expand full comment
deletedJun 26Liked by Roman Bystrianyk
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

This is interesting information, some of which I’ve seen before. Does this account for the 1918 phenomenon of illnesses simultaneously appearing across the Earth, and that it predominantly struck young, healthy adults, while mainly the elderly and children were not? I’m still looking for detailed evidence that it may have been new “vaccines” that were being used on military-aged men in combination with other factors such as high doses of aspirin. Thanks! Have a good day.

Expand full comment
deletedJun 26
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

All I know for sure about 1918 is that it was not a contagious pathogen. They proved this many times over. From what I’ve read, I think vaccination of the military and exposure to anthrax and other toxins are probably a more likely cause. Telephone lines is an interesting possibility and maybe played a role as well. It all comes down to terrain.

Expand full comment
deletedJul 4·edited Jul 4Liked by Roman Bystrianyk
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Very interesting. Certainly plausible.

Expand full comment