Data Hidden in Plain Sight

It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.― Giordano Bruno

In our fast-paced, technologically-advanced world, access to limitless amounts of information has never been greater. However, with this abundance of information comes a great deal of complexity and confusion. Because we can get overwhelmed, we often leave the interpretation of this avalanche of data to those that we might believe are experts.

Unfortunately, the interpretation of facts and events can be manipulated and shaped by those in power to often reinforce their preconceived notions and serve their own agendas. Governments, institutions, companies, and organizations often try to control the narrative to maintain their hold on power and secure their profits, using the media as a tool to shape public opinion.

As informed citizens, it is our responsibility to critically evaluate the information we are presented with, to question its authenticity and validity, and to seek out the truth. By using our innate intelligence to educate ourselves and break free from their control, we can empower ourselves to make informed decisions and take control of our own destinies.

One area of particular interest to us is the topic of infectious diseases. By studying historical data, we can gain a deeper understanding of how these diseases have affected populations in the past and see if the measures taken to prevent or treat them were effective or necessary. This knowledge can help us make better decisions and take appropriate actions to protect ourselves and our communities.

When it comes to understanding complex information, a mortality chart is a powerful tool. This graphical representation allows us to easily visualize death rates for a specific population over time, providing a clear and accurate picture of trends and patterns.

A mortality chart standardizes the data by expressing the death rate as the number of deaths per 100,000 individuals. This allows for fair comparison over time, regardless of population size changes. The chart’s vertical y-axis displays the death rate as the number of deaths per 100,000 individuals, and the horizontal x-axis represents the years. With this visual representation, we can quickly and easily identify trends in death rates and observe the impact of interventions on death rates over time.

For example, let’s take a closer look at the impact of measles on mortality rates. In the United States, national mortality statistics for measles were first compiled in 1900. The mortality rate is represented on the vertical y-axis, expressed as deaths per 100,000 individuals. The horizontal x-axis shows the years beginning in 1900 and ending in 1970. As the years progressed, the chart demonstrates fluctuations in the number of deaths caused by measles, with an overall trend of decreasing deaths over time. The measles injection was introduced in 1963, and as you can see on the chart, the death rate from measles had been reduced by a striking 98.6% from its peak by that time.

Similarly, in England, national mortality statistics for measles were first compiled much earlier in 1838. Similar to the United States, the number of deaths from measles fluctuated throughout the years. Throughout the 1800s, the trend for measles deaths was relatively stable. However, a substantial downward trend began to emerge towards the end of the century, continuing throughout the 1900s. The measles injection was introduced in 1968, and by that point, the death rate from measles had decreased by an astounding 99.8% from its peak – almost 100%.

These charts are made from official government data, which is widely available and easily accessible to governments, institutions, companies, and organizations. These statistics are rock-solid, providing us with a clear picture of the impact of measles on mortality rates over time. The charts created from this data in the 1960s can even be found on the CDC website, serving as a testament to the accuracy and reliability of this information.

Death Rates for Measles 1900-1960 (Vital Statistics of the United States 1940-1960, p. 85, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsrates1940_60.pdf)

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that every other infectious disease – whooping cough, scarlet fever, tuberculosis, typhoid, Diptheria, flu, pneumonia, and others – experienced a simultaneous decline along with measles! From the late 1800s into the early 1900s, they all dropped dramatically! By the 1950s and 60s, death rates from all these diseases had decreased by 90% to 100% without the need for any injections or major medical interventions.

Even the much-talked-about smallpox, which was once a highly deadly disease, remained deadly until the end of the 1800s but then collapsed by 1920 when it had become a mild disease often confused with chickenpox.

...chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.

John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, and Harry Mill Lancaster, An Introduction to the Practice of Preventive Medicine, 1922, C.V. Mosby Company, p. 197.

United States – The 72,946 smallpox cases in 1902 fell to 9,877 in 1939 [86.5% decrease]. The 2,510 smallpox deaths in 1902 fell to 38 in 1939 [98.5% decrease]. The case/fatality rate of 4.24 in 1900 fell to 0.38 in 1939 [91% decrease].

“Smallpox in the United States: Its decline and geographic distribution,” Public Health Reports, vol. 55, no. 50, December 13, 1940, pp. 2303-2312.

This decline in death rates for these infectious diseases is not just a coincidence but rather a result of the significant improvements in living conditions, sanitation, nutrition, and other factors that occurred during this time period. These changes helped to create a healthier population, which in turn made them less vulnerable to these diseases. So much so that by the early 1900s, so-called infectious diseases were not considered to be of any serious concern.

From the vital statistics of insurance companies, we learn that life for children in this country has been made infinitely safer. We have reduced death from principal communicable diseases of childhood—measles, scarlet fever, whooping cough, diphtheria—by 31% in a single year to a new record low, a point actually promising complete eradication of these diseases!

“2 Inches Taller . . . 15 Pounds Heavier,” Life, June 2, 1941, p. 71.

Measles, scarlet fever, whooping cough, and diphtheria—the principal communicable diseases of childhood—declined 31 percent in the year, or from 4.2 per 100,000 in 1939 to 2.9 in 1940. Each of these diseases reached a new minimum in 1940, and all except whooping cough had a mortality rate of less than 1 per 100,000. Only a comparatively few years ago the death toll from this group of diseases was serious, but it has now been reduced to a point where their complete suppression may be expected. The public-health movement is said to be responsible for the reduction in mortality from diarrhea and enteritis, which in 1930 had a rate of 20.4 per 100,000 and in 1940 had dropped to a rate of 4.6. Advances in sanitary science, including the Pasteurization of milk, the better refrigeration of foods, and the purification of water supplies, as well as the general rise in the standard of living, are the main reasons for this improvement.

Handbook of Labor Statistics, 1941 Edition, US Department of Labor, pp. 396–397.

It’s important to note that this decline in death rates from these diseases occurred long before the introduction of injections and other medical interventions. It is a testament to the power of public health measures in preventing deaths and improving the well-being of populations. The decline in deaths due to these diseases serves as a powerful reminder that we have the ability to control and prevent these diseases.

With this crucial information in mind, it’s natural to ask some important questions.

1.       Why isn’t this information more widely known?

2.       Why aren’t governments, institutions, companies, organizations, and the media highlighting this information?

3.       Where are the investigations, documentaries, and public hearings on this topic?

4.       Why don’t organizations such as the CDC, World Health Organization, doctors, pediatricians, and others prominently displaying these charts and making this information more widely available?

5.       Why are medical journals not providing this information to their readers?

6.       If over 98% to 100% of measles deaths were prevented without injections, why was a new method using injections implemented and made mandatory for everyone?

7.       Does this massive decline in measles deaths without injections disprove germ theory?

8.       If something so fundamental and easily accessible has been missed or ignored, what other important information have authorities and experts mishandled?

9.       How could data hidden in plain sight have been missed or ignored for so long?

10.   How can we trust these systems and the information they provide if they are not transparent and forthcoming with such important knowledge?

These are important questions that deserve to be examined and answered. It highlights the importance of critical thinking, questioning, and investigation in understanding the facts and making informed decisions. Only by doing so can we hope to uncover the truth and make better decisions for ourselves, our communities, and our world.

Once we realize the illusion we have been living under for decades, we can break free and take control of our own health and happiness. We don’t have to live in fear. We don’t have to live under a totalitarian medical state where we are treated like criminals because we don’t believe the prevailing medical dogma disguised as science.

It is essential to be vigilant and stay informed, for only through knowledge and understanding can we hope to find the truth, be empowered, and truly be free. We must question the information presented to us, do our own research, and be critical of the sources of information. Only by doing so can we hope to make informed decisions and live the life we want.

We can take back the power we have so freely given away. We can stop being obedient followers and start being informed and educated individuals. We can take control of our own lives, make our own choices, and live the way we want to. We can be healthier, happier, and at peace. We can be free.

https://odysee.com/@RomanBystrianyk:1/Data-Hidden-in-Plain-Sight:4