Childhood vaccines = a steady line of patients for big pharma in the decades ahead. There is no reason to ever vaccinate anyone since vaccines are 100% poisons, not health serums and they certainly offer no protection against anything your body cannot already protect you from.
Absolutely frightening. Would share on Nextdoor but got banned a few weeks ago, after sharing way too many truths about measles. 😄 Apparently, they aren't big fans of charts, data, references and the like.
One of the references in the Cherry paper you cite is this one - which Cherry also co-authored:
Frequency of unrecognized Bordetella pertussis infections in adults Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Sep;21(3):639-42. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.3.639.
Abstract reads as:
"To investigate the frequency of unrecognized Bordetella pertussis infections in adults, we performed IgA and IgG ELISA antibody studies with four B. pertussis antigens--i.e., lymphocytosis-promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and fimbriae-2--in 51 health care workers from whom six consecutive yearly serum samples (from 1984 to 1989) were available.
Overall, 90% of the subjects had a significant increase in antibody (IgA or IgG) to one or more antigens between 2 consecutive years during the 5-year study period; 55% of subjects had evidence of two infections, 17% had three infections, and 4% had four infections. Infections occurred in all study years, with the following rates: 1984-1985, 32%; 1985-1986, 24%; 1986-1987, 40%; 1987-1988, 29%; and 1988-1989, 43% (P = .12).
Some antibody rises may have been due to responses to cross-reacting antigens (Bordetella parapertussis, nontypable Haemophilus influenzae), but overall these data suggest that B. pertussis infections in adults are common, endemic, and usually unrecognized."
So the disease detected (via their stupid tests) is so serious that it's usually unrecognized??!!
This is THE recurring theme in the entire field - hunting for and finding things of little or no clinical relevance.
Thanks for the reference—very helpful! Yes, exactly. The tests flag you as “infected” simply because they detect the presence of bacterial DNA or RNA, even if you're not showing any symptoms or are actually sick. Sadly, it's a great big game of finding the microbe while almost 100% ignoring the person's health. Brilliant.
It seems we all have different reasons for whatever level of understanding of this insane game all of us were born into and forced to play. Thanks for your comment!
"..Taking all of these factors into account, it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines..."
When we said this..we were called "anti science"...
take, for instance, the hot topic right now autism.
why is the aluminum adjuvant found in higher amounts in the brains of the autistic? why do health authorities ignore the Bradford hill criteria? why do 'placebo-controlled' studies often use aluminum products or even other vaccines rather than saline placebos?
Vaccines don't prevent anything, these chemical weapons of mass destruction are only meant to reduce the world population whilst generating a revenue stream.
I have a simple way of explaining the difference between a "live" vaccine and a "dead" vaccine, a live vaccine contains a partical they "assume" exists in the inoculum and they "assume" causes a disease. A dead vaccine on the other hand contains a "component" they believe comes from a partical they "assume" exists and what they "assume" causes a disease. An awful large amount of assumption base evidence.
Science has overstepped. Lost or forgot natures/ the body's ingenious way of healing and divine order or natural selection, not everyone is supposed to survive and people simply should not be kept alive artificially.. pushed by pharma, this shortsighted and greedy thinking needs to stop.
Just because one can.. human kind has never been this sick..
That vaccine study for safety? It HAS been done. Dr. Thomas appeared to be referencing a study by a European hexavalent vaccine manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). In 2011, GSK produced a confidential report on SIDS. However, an Italian court forced GSK to make the report publicly available. In the report, sudden deaths that occurred within 20 days after hexavalent vaccination were tabulated. The manufacturer concluded that all sudden deaths were reported within days of receiving a vaccine. Following the study, GSK sealed the report on its findings. https://slaynews.com/news/top-pediatrician-vaccines-cause-97-sudden-infant-deaths/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJqsXFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHnN3jY70iwINkMudFP-pvynDRmm69q-pf5ihJjRLSZapEU-RHSlxM3V82ymr_aem_Wf9EJGd32GLTq_cSuIhRDg
Childhood vaccines = a steady line of patients for big pharma in the decades ahead. There is no reason to ever vaccinate anyone since vaccines are 100% poisons, not health serums and they certainly offer no protection against anything your body cannot already protect you from.
😢❤️🙏❤️
Seen https://odysee.com/@SixthSense-Truth-Search-Labs:0/Is-there-such-a-thing-as-auto-immune-disease---let's-look-at:7?
Absolutely frightening. Would share on Nextdoor but got banned a few weeks ago, after sharing way too many truths about measles. 😄 Apparently, they aren't big fans of charts, data, references and the like.
One of the references in the Cherry paper you cite is this one - which Cherry also co-authored:
Frequency of unrecognized Bordetella pertussis infections in adults Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Sep;21(3):639-42. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.3.639.
Abstract reads as:
"To investigate the frequency of unrecognized Bordetella pertussis infections in adults, we performed IgA and IgG ELISA antibody studies with four B. pertussis antigens--i.e., lymphocytosis-promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and fimbriae-2--in 51 health care workers from whom six consecutive yearly serum samples (from 1984 to 1989) were available.
Overall, 90% of the subjects had a significant increase in antibody (IgA or IgG) to one or more antigens between 2 consecutive years during the 5-year study period; 55% of subjects had evidence of two infections, 17% had three infections, and 4% had four infections. Infections occurred in all study years, with the following rates: 1984-1985, 32%; 1985-1986, 24%; 1986-1987, 40%; 1987-1988, 29%; and 1988-1989, 43% (P = .12).
Some antibody rises may have been due to responses to cross-reacting antigens (Bordetella parapertussis, nontypable Haemophilus influenzae), but overall these data suggest that B. pertussis infections in adults are common, endemic, and usually unrecognized."
So the disease detected (via their stupid tests) is so serious that it's usually unrecognized??!!
This is THE recurring theme in the entire field - hunting for and finding things of little or no clinical relevance.
Thanks for the reference—very helpful! Yes, exactly. The tests flag you as “infected” simply because they detect the presence of bacterial DNA or RNA, even if you're not showing any symptoms or are actually sick. Sadly, it's a great big game of finding the microbe while almost 100% ignoring the person's health. Brilliant.
The tests there were actually antibody tests, but the same principles apply.
As we wrote here, the portrayal of serology as a black-box infected yes / not is a fantasy construct.
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/novelty-and-immunity-why-were-we
All by design; there are no mistakes. Population control combined with profits for those behind the genocide has always been their game plan.
Exactly, just seems Roman is too indoctrinated still to see that - or admit it to himself.
It seems we all have different reasons for whatever level of understanding of this insane game all of us were born into and forced to play. Thanks for your comment!
"..Taking all of these factors into account, it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines..."
When we said this..we were called "anti science"...
But Fauci can say it.....ffs
sickness-for-profit business model
take, for instance, the hot topic right now autism.
why is the aluminum adjuvant found in higher amounts in the brains of the autistic? why do health authorities ignore the Bradford hill criteria? why do 'placebo-controlled' studies often use aluminum products or even other vaccines rather than saline placebos?
https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/new-paper-evidence-showing-childhood
Hi Roman, there is no such things as an "immune system", since there is nothing to be "immune" from. See https://odysee.com/@SixthSense-Truth-Search-Labs:0/Is-there-such-a-thing-as-auto-immune-disease---let's-look-at:7.
Of course, there is a "repair and detoxification" system.
"Vaccine mistake"... that's funny. Vaccines are intentionally harmful to reduce the world population, but I suspect you haven't gotten that memo yet.
I don't know if it's a mistake if they are knowingly hurting children.
Be a good Mason.
https://substack.com/profile/51223300-anthony-colpo/note/c-96705992
DOES IT MAKE SENSE?
BruceWales©️5/16/25 7:23-7:49am
1
Does it make sense
To try to prevent
Some sickness or evil
Before it comes about?
2
Does it make sense
To legislate
And decide what actions
Should not be allowed?
CHORUS
Of course it does
Everybody knows
Of course it does
That is how our thriving grows
Just think ahead
And make a plan
That deflects misery
So the best can
Happen then
To our humanity
3
Does it make sense
To test for chance
That remedies may hurt
More than the ill itself?
4
Does it make sense
To identify
Professions that just give
Bad jabs to build their wealth?
CHORUS (repeat)
INSTRUMEMTAL
BRIDGE
So, do a test
To see if side-effects
Indeed, aren’t on the side
Do a test
Science should tell
If balderdash abides
5
Does it make sense
To steer away from
Those who will not think
Beyond amassing mounds
6
Does it make sense
To point them out and
Tell the world of
Hucksters you have found?
CHORUS (repeat)
(Spoken)
Does anybody know
Bad medicine
Anymore?
Vaccines don't prevent anything, these chemical weapons of mass destruction are only meant to reduce the world population whilst generating a revenue stream.
I have a simple way of explaining the difference between a "live" vaccine and a "dead" vaccine, a live vaccine contains a partical they "assume" exists in the inoculum and they "assume" causes a disease. A dead vaccine on the other hand contains a "component" they believe comes from a partical they "assume" exists and what they "assume" causes a disease. An awful large amount of assumption base evidence.
Was it a certain batch, or a certain year, or a certain company?
Science has overstepped. Lost or forgot natures/ the body's ingenious way of healing and divine order or natural selection, not everyone is supposed to survive and people simply should not be kept alive artificially.. pushed by pharma, this shortsighted and greedy thinking needs to stop.
Just because one can.. human kind has never been this sick..
Common sense and ethics seem gone...
Do no harm.
Have you seen https://odysee.com/@SixthSense-Truth-Search-Labs:0/Is-there-such-a-thing-as-auto-immune-disease---let's-look-at:7?
Thanks! Creating life long patients with vaccines.. shooting up infants.. sacrilege..