21 Comments
Oct 29Liked by Roman Bystrianyk

Love your work. And books. But still don’t get why you never emphasize that viruses don’t exist. Because that is the heart of the problem. No viruses no vaccines.

Expand full comment
author

Some vaccines are bacterial in nature—for example, pertussis. It was not good, but that’s in part due to bacteria colonizing the lungs. By the mid-1900s, it was a mild disease because of all the improvements in health.

Viruses… well, I’ve read a lot, but I still have some nagging questions that I haven’t resolved, so I’m not in either camp. What I can say is that because of the near-zero mortality rate by the time a vaccine or no vaccine came out, other factors were far more important than any bacteria or virus. I know doctors on both sides of the debate, and they also say that what’s important is that we don’t support vaccines to tackle these illnesses.

Expand full comment
24 hrs agoLiked by Roman Bystrianyk

This is why I don't take any vaccines or drugs and haven't for decades.

Expand full comment

Ayup. When a psych recommended ssri and I questioned her, the research, the side effects, etc, she called me a narcissist and said exactly this “all medicine is a trial and error thing” with a dismissive flip of her hand.

Expand full comment

‘So many of you, those that are truly independent thinkers, if you allowed yourself to realize how truly moronic every doctor you’ve ever met is, you not only would never speak to them again, you would put a leash on them.

One that could be seen and held.

In contrast to the intellectual choke collars the medical schools put on each of them.

Expand full comment

Where you state whooping cough is mucosal, surely, this must apply to flu and SARSCov2, if the latter was real? Kids get the nose sniff flu innoculations now. Trust the Evidence stack has written about the actual low numbers of influenza A&B, the majority being influenza like illnesses, with same symptoms, which majority get. Who knew that?

Expand full comment

I am a DES daughter. If that experiment on pregnant women is in your article, I missed it. If even YOU don’t know about it…

Expand full comment

Will you explain what is DES? I've not heard or read this until now. Thanks.

Expand full comment
19 hrs agoLiked by Roman Bystrianyk

diethylstilbestrol (DES) (a synthetic estrogen) was given to women who went into early labor in the 1950’s and 60’s to see if it would stop the labor. There was “increased risk of breast cancer among women given DES during pregnancy and a possible excess of precancerous abnormalities of the cervix and vagina among women exposed to DES in utero” according to the government.

Doctors were required by the FDA to notify the women they had treated and advise screening for them and their affected offspring. I was told in my mid 20’s.

Side effects of in utero exposure is incomplete development of the vas deferens in males (creating infertility), and clear cell carcinoma, cervical cancer, and breast cancer in females. Also in females there was damage to the cervix interfering with dilation during childbirth, as well as fertility issues.

The women themselves have a higher risk of breast cancer and other reproductive cancers.

My mother died of ovarian cancer at 70.

Expand full comment

Thanks. I'm sorry to hear about your mum and hope you are ok, although I'm sure this has affected you knowing what it did. Just read the wiki link by kitten too. I read somewhere that in UK, where I am, after Thalidomide, they promised to look at all drugs and pregnancy but they haven't. In my family, nurse wife of a nephew delivered a boy 2 months early, last September. He had respiratory distress but pulled through that, and then died a couple of weeks later. I don't know all details but they were told he was brain damaged. Knowing all family took jabs and her being a student nurse, she'd have been encouraged or coerced by her employer. I just wish I knew what I know now, when I had my babies 30+ years ago. I'm not a grandma, yet, may not happen, but I passed a copy of Turtles all the Way Down to my daughter for their friends who'd just had a baby to read. Her partner said he was very interested to read it too. I know it's still unread, sitting on the shelf instead of educating new parents and it's frustrating.

Expand full comment

That’s a good book. Hope they read it.

My cervix refused to cooperate and my kids were born by section. Most people think this is no big deal, but it affects the natural colonizing of the newborn gut by exposure to the mother’s microbiome, as well as exposing the baby to the drugs involved with surgery.

After my mother’s death I had a complete hysterectomy from the cervix up, in an attempt to reduce my risk.

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry about your mother, Candy. And I'm sorry for everything else you've had to deal with as well because of that drug.

Expand full comment

The only tool that allows all these ghastly things - and motivates most pf them - is money. And money is an archaic tool. They hide the tech that makes it archaic.

Money Motivates the Most Marvelous Manifestations! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/money-motivates-the-most-marvelous

Expand full comment

As an aside…..apart from the ridiculously large amount of money being made………how long do you suppose it will take before Ozempic is exposed?

Expand full comment

Thalidomide is still being used. Apparently, it's marvellous in cancer treatment.

A cursory look at Wikipedia - particularly the side effects section - is pretty scary, even if you have cancer.

Expand full comment

I have a distant memory of the use of thalidomide being put forward in Leprosy management? Sometime in 1990’s?

Expand full comment

Apparently so. Leprosy is mostly found in Asia and Africa. The usual easy victims of toxic pharmaceuticals that are no longer marketable in the "1st world"..

I doubt if leprosy is really a thing.

Expand full comment

When I say "found", I mean "fabricated".

Expand full comment

not so far. chemtrais/

Expand full comment