38 Comments

Unfortunately most people do not read books anymore and have a TikTok attention span.

Expand full comment

How about making a short TikTok (and for other platforms) video with these charts?

Expand full comment

Good idea, but I am old and not computer illiterate. I don't use any social media aps except Substack.

Expand full comment

I'm sure this info is floating around on TikTok. More should share it, though!

Expand full comment

Unlearning and relearning is difficult. Roman was influential for me as I began that journey five years ago. To question the efficacy of vaccination was anathema, unthinkable...yet, I persisted.

From that beginning from 'Dissolving illusions" I discovered those who question virology and the existence of viruses. It now seems to me beyond doubt that virology is a product of medical tyranny that has gripped us for over a hundred years. There is more unlearning to be done, but it remains hard, as it challenges long held dogma that we leaned, seemingly from birth.

I recommend for anyone interested this excellent paper, recently published by Denis Rancourt https://denisrancourt.substack.com/ and Correlation Research:

https://correlation-canada.org/respiratory-epidemics-without-viral-transmission/

Expand full comment

.

My Favorite Parts Of Covid:

#7

That the doctors think the medical freedom movement is for the freedom to practice medicine.

While the rest of us are shouting “It’s the medicine”, central to your profession, that is killing everyone.

Yo.

.

Expand full comment

I admire the way you have clear diagrams with proper REAL references.

I used to follow another well patronised substack but got sick of checking the references or diagrams.Most of the time the writer would throw up a diagram...make a claim..and people would be getting outraged at the conclusion.

Yet if they bothered to look carefully it was a BS diagram made by someone else based on fairy tale mystery data.

I gave up asking them why they did this as they never responded and none of his readers appeared to care..

Expand full comment

Thank you very much. I've always tried to be accurate with all the data I present, and to date, I haven't had anyone challenge any of them. I'm actually grateful for people who find mistakes and let me know.

Expand full comment

Who had their tonsils removed as a child?

"In the 1860s and 1870s, scarlet fever was so virulent that families could expect to lose three out of five children to it. In some cases, it was so deadly that it could destroy life in a few hours.

Symptoms included a sore throat, fever, inflammation of lymph nodes, abscessing of the throat and tonsils, and a rash.

The infection could progress quickly, and children in 19th century epidemics have been known to succumb within 48 hours.

Causes

The Industrial Revolution led to a large number of people moving into cities, where overcrowding and poor sanitary conditions created ideal conditions for the spread of scarlet fever.

Treatments

Treatments included removing furniture from the sickroom, improving ventilation, rubbing the body with disinfectant, and bedrest for three weeks."

Q: Where did Scarlet Fever go? Nowhere. It's still around. I had it twice as teen, but by then it was known as strep throat:

-"Scarlet fever is caused by the bacteria group A streptococcus (group A strep), which is also the bacteria that causes strep throat. The bacteria release a toxin that causes a rash and red tongue."

Can you develop strep throat on your own?

A: You can get strep throat from your own dormant bacteria or from another person who has an active infection.

Wait, if you can get it yourself..... Why would bacteria, naturally present in everyone's body, suddenly bloom in a kid's throat?

Well, bacteria feed on dead cells. So something damages a lot of kids throats. But what? Air pollution? Or something consumed as food or drink?

"Streptococcus agalactiae (Strep ag) is an important mastitis pathogen because of its highly contagious nature and its ability to degrade milk quality. Most infected cows show no overt signs of disease such as abnormal milk, but have high somatic cell counts and decreased milk production".

Huh. Maybe that's why the FDA raids raw milk producers?

1920: "A streptococcus epidemic of moderate extent and severity was characterized by clinical symptoms different from the usual septic sore throat, though the organism found was culturally Streptococcus epidemicus. The infection was traced to the milk from a single quarter of the udder of a cow in a dairy of 112 cows producing an otherwise excellent grade of raw milk. A number of the milkers on the dairy farm were found infected. It was impossible to trace the infection of the cow's udder to any one of the milkers, though such an infection seems probable since the streptococcus isolated from the cow was in every respect like streptococci isolated from patients and milkers..."

Childhood illness deaths declined significantly after pasteurization & homogenization of milk began. The graphs match up.

But Germ Theory would be threatened if it was known that strep /scarlet fever are not contagious between individuals, but that it just seems that way because kids in the same household, school, church & community often consume the same toxic batch of milk or milk products.

-But wait, isnt there another bacteria that is spread in soft cheese, and can kill?

"Listeria is a bacteria that can contaminate cheese, causing a harmful infection in people who eat it:

Risk factors

Soft cheeses are more likely to be contaminated than hard cheeses because of their high moisture content, low salt content, and low acidity. Listeria can also grow in cheese at room and refrigerator temperatures."

Symptoms

Symptoms of listeriosis typically start within two weeks of eating contaminated food and can include:

Fever

Muscle aches

Nausea

Tiredness

Vomiting and diarrhea

Headache

Stiff neck

Confusion

Loss of balance

Convulsions

-Not on list above is swollen glands, sore throat.

But found elsewhere:

'A Listeria rash can appear as a non-painful, non-itchy eruption that can be papulopustular or vesiculopustular. The rash usually appears on exposed areas of the body, such as the hands and forearms. The median time from exposure to the onset of a rash is two days." (Sounds a lot like pox, huh?).

"Yes, a sore throat can be a symptom of listeriosis, a foodborne illness caused by the bacteria Listeria monocytogenes".

"Glandular listeriosis

This form of listeriosis resembles infectious mononucleosis and causes swelling of the salivary glands and nuchal lymph nodes."

Wait, Mono?

Is mono also caused by cows milk?

-IMO, the CDC & FDA are corrupt, fraudulent agencies.

I'm going to stop here.

.

.

Expand full comment

Good job Roman. Great angle. I DO remember being told by one of my indoctrinated teachers in public school and my mother believed that vaccines saved us from those diseases. I found this info shortly after the swine scam. What we need to do is get this to every pediatrician in America. May I copy this and send it out … I can probably fit 50 to a 100 pediatricians offices every month… btwn making copies, envelopes and stamps. But, I’d like to send to parents as well. But, the pediatricians really need to get this message.

Expand full comment

Of course, you're welcome to do so! Please peek at this booklet I put together at our new store. It's free to download and share!

https://payhip.com/b/EtJhe

Maybe we could put together something new based on these new charts? Message me please.

Expand full comment

Amazing! Thanks!

Expand full comment

Infectious diseases do not exist.

Expand full comment

Belief in infectious contagion is officially incorporated into corporately managed social and economic structures. The difference between 'communication' and 'contagion' is the perception of a negative payload.

The body (and material or physical) is 'officially' held to be the causal realm against which a limited, weak, or lacking 'body' must be defended, boosted and armed against.

This notion of a separate mind controlling a separate body in a world of separate thing, agents and threats runs psycho-pathological- as a masking and distancing denial of and attack on reality. By its claim to assert judgemental rights over communication - such that only what supports the narrative is permitted, and all else masked out, masked over or subverted to bolster the reactive identity as real.

Our capacity to communicate with each other (and thus ourselves) calls for acceptance of what is active (even if 'unconscious') as a starting point for opening a channel of communication.

If I need validation from others for my disregard of the virological or immunological or other bio-tech models, then I cannot simple share with another in freedom.

Their freedom to make choices is vital. To merely tell people they are wrong and must choose as we say - regardless substance for our claim - is to offer a target for the projection of their already captive imagination.

Expand full comment

I have questions. It’s late. First re: the chicken pox - measles etc parties… were people simply imagining expecting thus creating a possible pantheistic communication (communicable? … as in communicable disease) of similar symptoms vs contagion in the conventional narrative … this was a brainstorm blurt otherwise I’ll forget tommorrow… good night 🥱

Expand full comment

Real questions are good. We grow thereby.

There's no doubt that communication and life are inseparable - not in human conceptual communication - but as energy and informational exchange.

The model explanations for catching or transmitting disease don't stand up to scrutiny, so this releases false 'certainties' or assumptions to fresh exploration and discovery.

Likewise our concept of the mind - ie imagination - is both extremely downplaying the psychic element to our experience, while applied psychology drives the manipulation of the mass-mind for gain of possession and control of socially reinforcing perception-response patterns.

Science -to be science- should ask questions -and keep questioning its own interpretation of findings. But funding of science seeks a return on its investment, and parties collude in masking business dealings as for the greater good & etc.

My current views and expectations are fruits of my own living questioning. I don't think answers can hold real value if we don't first live the question - or let it move our curiosity and desire.

Expand full comment

I get that. However, part of the problem is losing the listener. With that in mind, if I want to prevent people from dying out of ignorance. I know of an easy solution. They are lead to believe in the contagious disease and they believe that’s what they have. The important thing isn’t to shatter all their illusions with truth. The important thing is to get them to take a grip ton of vitamin c which has been shown to be effective at literally curing every ‘known virus’ and I have the book that spells out the clinical evidence I can show them. And I can reassure them that if for some reason it doesn’t abate their symptoms that the men in white tell them, are caused by a virus, with great confidence. And sometimes they listen and their suffering ends shortly thereafter. Then at that point, that would probably be a good time to mention a few things you’ve said. However, most people have a kindergarten level of thinking and understanding about pretty much everything and nearly every misconception I’ve ever pointed out to people, has been completely rejected. So the only truth that matters is to get people to stop taking those bars of soap, believing they are just going for a nice shower. Or similar… then you might see if you can peak their interest before having these kinds of convos. Look, I have no problem picking up what you are laying down. But I’ve never been able to get the kindergarteners out of the cult. And if you study these things… it’s nearly impossible to get them to stop taking the kool aid. And I need something more compelling to reach pediatricians. Years ago I spent a lot of time on this very subject, the communication aspect of which you speak. I published sophomoric articles about the evidence I came across. It goes over most people’s heads and it’s never good enough for those with deeper understanding. The essence of my message is that if one is going to red pill someone, one needs to meet the receiver at their level. And the truth is that most people are too indoctrinated and unwilling to come out of the world of lies. Not to say truth and different perspectives shouldn’t be released into the ethos… but, certainly we have a responsibility to get the cult leaders to stop giving the adherents a diet of poison washed down Russian roulette flavored kool aid. I need a more succinct angle or compelling substantive argument if I’m going to include the illegitimacy of the current disease model. Firstly, if a persons symptoms are not of a contagious virus, as they, the men in white, believe to be true, they are very unlikely to perceive this kind of pantheistic notion. And they would need more explanation and years of ponderance and observation. In the meantime, they’ll continue on, maiming and murdering thinking they are doing good. The angle I would bring to a pediatrician would be to mention what I’ve been told at least twenty times, whenever I’ve brought my children in with cough or cold symptoms. Their standard, prior to 2020, was that they test for bacterial infections, often strep. Most of the time, this test would come back negative and they’d say, ‘it’s a virus’ and would explain there are no tests for virus and to go home and let the symptoms run its course and maybe they’d say, gargle w salt water or something relatively ineffective in terms of home remedies. But to come back if they get worse. I went thru this for 25 years. Then all of a sudden we have a viral test. How did this happen? That would be my angle of communication with these highly indoctrinated individuals who just want to get paid and have a nice lifestyle and feel good about how they achieved that. So let’s talk about communication on a deeper level. I need a few more succinct messages that won’t be immediately rejected. We are trying to save lives first and foremost.

Expand full comment

Send me a write up explaining this for the pediatricians.

Expand full comment

That’s not what I asked for. I know about these assertions. But, thanks, glad you are on board. I don’t doubt them. I’m asking for help. Please send a written paragraph or two with the intention of reaching pediatricians. Please write something up that you think would be compelling.

The second video seems to be blocked… I’ll check it again, not sure if I’m familiar with whatever that one has to say.

Expand full comment

I think if one was in a debate with Offit, I would only focus on this data and nothing else. Nothing about RCT, placebos, ingredients, autism rates, etc. Stick to this data and the rest is just noise.

Expand full comment

Roman, when will you realize that "infectious diseases" do not exist?

https://odysee.com/@WorldReport:4/The-Contagion-Myth-3:c

Expand full comment

I use the accepted phraseology of "infectious diseases" so that people know what is being discussed and let the data speak for itself.

Expand full comment

Oh god.. a "viruses and bacteria are mental constructs" child has jumped into the thread..

Because Roman/most of us here are not scientifically illiterate.

Why do none of you ever to Calcutta and drink from the Ganges...?????

Or...go to any sewerage system and start drinking...

I mean bacteria and viruses are just "constructs" right ???so it will be unpleasant tasting but safe...

All that hive mind of vapid smugness..and you and your "friends" never thought of that simple test....wow...

Now that someone else did the thinking for you(not for the first or last time)...on your bike go and do the experiment...

Whats that? your too busy sharing video links and asking dumb rhetorical questions?..

thought so..

Expand full comment

You jump so quickly to a false position as to seal your own mind against the possibility of a curiosity. Mask and distance from fear of contagion - eh!

Bacterial actions are foundational to life on earth. Not least for adaptive resilience. Their microscopic discovery as 'germs' (seeds) fed the hubris of a 'scientific elitism' for the rationalising denial of superstitions and the basis to eradicate disease. In other words our fears and hater of the evils of disease was projected to the 'germs as a cause of disease - as an attack on the body. hence a 'medicine' of countermeasures that attack the 'disease' as diagnosed to have got into the body. And a model of the body as frail and weak countermeasures that require boosting, augmenting and replacing by a biotech industrial complex.

I cant recall if it was Faraday or not but someone of such a reputation publicly drank from the well that was believed to be 'causing' a deadly typhus outbreak in London. he got the shits - that's it. Why? Because he did not suffer the deprivations of squalor, but was well nourished, of a sound morale and sense of self, life and purpose.

Like all ego propaganda the headline shouts while a process of retraction and revision runs in the background. The ego-function or GoF for fear-threat-control 'solution' persists while the basis for the 'solution' has long since been revealed false to any who would allow the dissonance arising from a false claim to form a question in their heart and mind.

As a term for poison; 'virus' was reassigned to 'germs' assumed active but too small to see as they could not be found. The mutation of virus theory is one of seeking props and extensions by which to invest ever more heavily in its 'War on disease' - with its principle cost being pain, misery and sacrifice of life to ever more complex models of dissociation. It runs a death wish (rather than lose face, lose control, and stand damned by the arrogance of its own convictions.

The mind projects its own motivations onto other and world - but most specifically to versions of others or imagined entities. The scapegoat mechanism does not truly save or heal but compounds conflicts by directing responsibility as guilt, away from Self - to others and world. Narrative control!

It is our illusions that we need be saved From - such as to live For the Good, the Beautiful and the True - as felt worth - not virtue credits under system capture.

Do the explorations of your own living - alongside other who are also called to life - even if along different paths. But only if you so choose to break the seal on the seed of a call to heal.

Expand full comment

Binra... the very munificent objectifier.... the magnificent magisterial one...hurls a firery thunder bolt of clarity against

snide and snarky obscurantism. Cheers

Welll Done Sir. ** Hear hear*.

Expand full comment

I appreciate your reply.

I encourage you to follow your own best sense of honesty, trust and guidance, so when I offer my own perspective, I am not seeking to 'pill' you or anyone into anything you are not freely and willingly accepting of.

There are choices that underlie what to us can seem obvious as a self-harming or suicide cult running under a mask of virtue. But these 'choices' are for the most part habits or 'conditioned' identifications that are 'deep set' in terms of running back to our formative years - prior to intellectual or rational self-reflective 'choice' as we tend to think it to be.

So for my part I see the mind is fundamentally operating 'survival masking' as IF to save itself, that in practice is undermining clear perception, real communication and functional existence - health at all levels as a whole.

Such a mind is the mind of our world, our times, our era and as such is invisible , internalised and normalised 'reality' or seemingly self-evident and overwhelmingly real.

It would 'save its life' in its own image and thus lose it - even while alive - to a self-imaged substitution for love, for being, for felt connection in the living and giving of meaning to thus share in.

Now I know I cannot communicate directly with the 'ego' except that the ego always interprets in terms of threat - regardless - so I speak to and learn or grow with the living one who is beneath or behind all appearances, appearances that cannot be separated from judgments, that cannot be set over another but that we also judge ourselves.

The ego's offer of security is of an 'escape' from fear - but it uses fear to maintain a mask of control by which pain is mitigated or redistributed 'away' or diverted and directed to others, our sphere of responsibility is relieved of dealing directly with our own conflict as we accept 'identity' within the ego-dictate as our (temporary security) permitted freedom or right.

Now I am not seeking to awaken paediatricians or anyone else in particular, but establishing a basis for communication is vital, else no matter what is masked to you, they are not listening with you- let alone to you as you think to be sharing meanings that hold value for you. Our current world is economically structured to the 'ego' as I use the term, and as such is a systemic capture of the mind to 'think' without love, by masking in the forms of perceived virtues taken from opposition or resistance to perceived evils - or unwanted outcomes ie fear or threat of pain of loss.

Perhaps where you are the system of 'paediatric care' is mandatory or incentivised under regulatory capture by pharmaceutical profit-for-sickness+sacrifice.

Willingness to question dictates will grow as the mask disintegrates to reveal the nature and the extent of lies given power. And conflicts will rise from 'counter-lies' or attempts to regain control over fear rather than abiding through to the freedom to question - for real questions are not merely restatements of the problem in the form of a question.

What is the basis for trusting or abiding with life through the experience of conflicts, pain and emotional reactivity? That is what is needed. Listening deeper than our mind had previously permitted. We may not know we were masked from such 'territory' until we choose to NOT use the mask - because at some level we recognise that that not only doesn't really work, it blocks the only ways in which life really works. It may seem humiliating to who we thought we were or should be. But is a willingness to open to uncover more of who we are - with everyone.

You are the Message - but not as you may think. In receiving truth from another living one, you will automatically reflect and extend it. While we think to know already, we judge reality (of others as our self and world), and at some level that is felt as a withdrawal or withholding or presence. This is the 'threat' to which (our) ego is finely attuned to pick up on no matter what else is being said or shared.

Be the space of an acceptance into which their own question can arise as a welcome to your joining with them. If it doesn't arise, don't invalidate your offer or their freedom, but within your own integrity meet whatever of them can be joined with.

Not supporting another's current choices is a true witness when supporting their freedom to evaluate and change their mind with new evidence or feedback. But as you notice we often attack or demean another for their choices as a projection of self-judgement. We are learners and teachers both.

Expand full comment

Stock up on vitamin c… there’s lots of other good stuff too, but if you don’t know much or are strapped for money… get yourself some vitamin c… take it three times a day w food and if you do feel like you are coming down w something… take more… team hotez is about to launch another bio weapons attack on humanity.

Expand full comment

Roman, is there any data and information in your book relating to the HPV vaccine and cervical cancer? I don’t want my 12 year old daughter to have this injection. My wife wants her to have it. I need information and data relating to this. Thank you.

Expand full comment

HPV is probably a fake virus and doesn't cause cervical cancer. But - let's pretend we believe in the viruses and this particular virus "causes cervical cancer" - there are over 200 "types" of HPV virus. They can't "vaccinate" against all of them and they will find more "types" faster than they can "vaccinate" against.

The original vaccine was against 1 or 2 "types". Then they made another one that "protects" against 4 "types". Now they have yet another one that "protects" against "9 types." They are a very far long away from all the hundreds of types.

So even if you believe in it you are playing whack-a-mole against a virus that is mutating too fast and - let's be honest - there's no way they have "identified" all the "types" in the world, which means you will always be in a position of finding out there are yet more "types" than scientists have "found" and "vaccinated" against.

So unless you want to basically continuously get HPV vaccines all the time, it seems like it's pointless.

(On top of the fact that it is probably toxic garbage and there was an issue with the HPV vaccine roll-out in India in 2010 - in terms of deaths and bad side effects to young women and girls. But that might be a no-go topic for certain people.)

Plus you can avoid it via things like "safe sex" or if you are a child, "not having sex" (which hopefully is the norm???). It totally blows my mind people want to give this stuff to middle school girls.

Expand full comment

if interested, share your email address to me at nptru4u.substack.com. I wrote my masters pharm paper on the nonsense of hpv, only problem now is, much citations are scrubbed or mocked on the web if one looked them up would need a wayback or archives look. I stopped writing subs a while back but wrote on covid harms from my patients adverse event and death experiences after rollouts.

Expand full comment

If you would like to chat on the phone or Zoom, that might be best. If you would like to, send me a private message.

Expand full comment

That’s very kind, thank you. When the time is suitable I’ll get back to you.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this information. Incredibly important. As soon as I have time I will go into it in more detail, especially the combination of statistics and morality. It makes it clear that people do not act like a rational animal, that is, a person will act on his own strength, guided by being able to consult himself. But mainly only consulting the herd it belongs to. On the contrary of behaving rational, it is based on fear appearing in a herd. Instructing mothers to take a shot will convince their children to do so too, thus acting not like a rational human being, but just like all other mammals do. People refuse to believe that this information represents facts. Not the way modern, private or institutions, inquisitors 'fact-checker' are using the concept of fact. Politicians are using science only as a way to dominate the discours in order to remain political power, guided by a confirm believe doing the right thing.

Expand full comment

Amazing work!

Expand full comment

Vaccine revenue streams matter too, so incentive restructuring is of great import to change the status quo.

Expand full comment

Excellent overview Roman!

Expand full comment

Very worrying about the development of these maRNA self amplifying vaccines. My understanding is it will turn people into walking shedding factories and we will be vaccinated against our wish; this is catastrophic for the human race and other species. Wtf do we do??

Expand full comment