The inventor of the polio vaccine, Dr. Sabin, testified before congress that the "official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection."
If I didn't leave a source, it's because that quote is all over the internet, but only on alt sites and blogs. Beforeitsnews.com was probably the biggest one. I wrote that book before I had Chris Graves and Peter Secosh helping me out so much with research, and they can really dig for sources. Thanks!
Did anyone notice that today's measles hysteria is occurring in heavily vaccinated states and that the strain matches the one in the jab? Give a live virus, get a live virus especially in those who are probably immune compromised from mRNA jabs.
Maybe you would be interested in Chris Knobbe? I invite you to watch youtube, or read his book. (I do not agree with everything he says.) He points out that sugar consumption has gone down since 2012.
The government subsidized soy and corn (GMO). The oils from that go into processed food and almost all restaurant food. The omega-6's in that food have properties like estrogen. Estrogen is a repair hormone (early in the process) that promotes growth of new cells. The metabolic theory of cancer that I subscribe to, is if all these new cells do not have enough energy to maintain themselves (provide structure, repair DNA and build connections to surrounding cells), then they degenerate and change their "behaivior" to survive out of context of the whole organism.
The omega 6's appear to reduce the amount of T4 and its conversion to T3, a hormone that actively helps to produce energy. A.K.A poison. Also, read up on the Randle Cycle. RayPeat.com
If you want to reduce fear of measles you have to point to both successful treatment and protocols by doctors/hospitals and what successful home prevention or treatment look like.
Also, what are the comorbidities a person might have that could change the vaccine's risk/benefit ratio?
The scale on the graph doesn't seem right. I thought measles death rate was 1/10,000 just before the measles vax was in widespread use in the 1960's but much higher in early 1900's? In the early 1900's the graph shows about 1/10,000 - I thought it was much higher.
The scale on the graph is death rates for 1/100,000
It wasn`t a notifiable disease in the US until 1912.
There would be variations in numbers depending on the data set.
"..In 1912, measles became a nationally notifiable disease in the United States, requiring U.S. healthcare providers and laboratories to report all diagnosed cases. In the first decade of reporting, an average of 6,000 measles-related deaths were reported each year..."
The scale is in "deaths per 100,000 infections." The graph shows about 13 deaths per 100,000 infections in 1900 which is 1.3 per 10,000 infections. The records show that in 1962 there were 400 deaths and 4M infections which is 1 death per 10,000 infections. Something's wrong with the graph. There should be many more deaths in 1900 for the scale on this graph - more like 10,000. The death rate dropped over 95% between 1900 and 1962.
The inventor of the polio vaccine, Dr. Sabin, testified before congress that the "official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection."
He was speaking about polio, I imagine. Do you have a reference for this?
Glad you asked.
The quote was in Donald Jeffries book Crimes And Coverups in American Politics.
Many references in the book but not with that quote.
You might reach out to his Substack.
Let me know your result.
Thanks.
I just sent a message. I searched the literature but haven't found it yet.
It seems like a common quote.
Jeffries mentions a senate subcommittee. It might be expunged from the congressional record??
If I had a basic idea of where I could search deeper for it, but so far, nothing has come up.
See my new post.
Looks like it might be expunged reference.
Congressional records should have all kinds of true statements about these products.
From Donald Jeffries;
If I didn't leave a source, it's because that quote is all over the internet, but only on alt sites and blogs. Beforeitsnews.com was probably the biggest one. I wrote that book before I had Chris Graves and Peter Secosh helping me out so much with research, and they can really dig for sources. Thanks!
Can you show the exact source of the quote please?
Did anyone notice that today's measles hysteria is occurring in heavily vaccinated states and that the strain matches the one in the jab? Give a live virus, get a live virus especially in those who are probably immune compromised from mRNA jabs.
Vaccination = poison. There is no live virus. Measles in this case would be an affect of the vaccinations i.e. the body expelling the poison.
Measles virus doesn't exist, never did and never will.
Checked search engine yandex and brave. It seems to be a common quote with no reference.
What about cancer? Did that not make the list?
Malignant Neoplasm
How Measles Became a Monster Again. The Vaccine Fear Campaign That Rewrote History. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/how-measles-became-a-monster-again
So, in the early sixties, cardio vascular deaths occurred 3 times more often than deaths of cancer? I think nowadays they're roughly equal.
What happened?
Food quality has gone in the toilet, sugar content thru the roof. Cancer loves weakened immune system accentuated by vaxing
Maybe you would be interested in Chris Knobbe? I invite you to watch youtube, or read his book. (I do not agree with everything he says.) He points out that sugar consumption has gone down since 2012.
The government subsidized soy and corn (GMO). The oils from that go into processed food and almost all restaurant food. The omega-6's in that food have properties like estrogen. Estrogen is a repair hormone (early in the process) that promotes growth of new cells. The metabolic theory of cancer that I subscribe to, is if all these new cells do not have enough energy to maintain themselves (provide structure, repair DNA and build connections to surrounding cells), then they degenerate and change their "behaivior" to survive out of context of the whole organism.
The omega 6's appear to reduce the amount of T4 and its conversion to T3, a hormone that actively helps to produce energy. A.K.A poison. Also, read up on the Randle Cycle. RayPeat.com
If you want to reduce fear of measles you have to point to both successful treatment and protocols by doctors/hospitals and what successful home prevention or treatment look like.
Also, what are the comorbidities a person might have that could change the vaccine's risk/benefit ratio?
Successful tx ? How about the "real" numbers how most of us recovered in the 60's and 70's without vaxing.
I had a BCG vaccine in 1975 and was very ill at some point afterwards. I now suspect the vaccine. It took me all summer to get over it.
The scale on the graph doesn't seem right. I thought measles death rate was 1/10,000 just before the measles vax was in widespread use in the 1960's but much higher in early 1900's? In the early 1900's the graph shows about 1/10,000 - I thought it was much higher.
The scale on the graph is death rates for 1/100,000
It wasn`t a notifiable disease in the US until 1912.
There would be variations in numbers depending on the data set.
"..In 1912, measles became a nationally notifiable disease in the United States, requiring U.S. healthcare providers and laboratories to report all diagnosed cases. In the first decade of reporting, an average of 6,000 measles-related deaths were reported each year..."
https://www.cdc.gov/measles/about/history.html
The scale is in "deaths per 100,000 infections." The graph shows about 13 deaths per 100,000 infections in 1900 which is 1.3 per 10,000 infections. The records show that in 1962 there were 400 deaths and 4M infections which is 1 death per 10,000 infections. Something's wrong with the graph. There should be many more deaths in 1900 for the scale on this graph - more like 10,000. The death rate dropped over 95% between 1900 and 1962.
You got the scale wrong and instead of saying " I was wrong" you persist.
wow
The graph we are looking at in this reality doesnt show 13 deaths at all.
2 wrong
I told you different data bases will pull different numbers
3 wrong
we know what the flipping death rate did.. the end :)
The last graph shows 13 deaths per 100,000 in 1900 for measles which is the green line. Do you see that?