Before losing my job of over 20 years teaching chess in the Tribeca/Battery Park City section of New York City for refusing the toxic, deadly covid injections. My job randomly mandated that I start taking tuberculosis test to be able to teach after I had already worked there for 10 years having never taken a sick day. That was one of the steps on the slippery slope towards the dehumanizing covid injection mandates, the vaccine passports and the new biosecurity state.
I was surprised to read that syphilis was one of the diseases that vaccination caused. I'd thought it was purely a sexually transmitted disease. It had existed for centuries in Europe before vaccination was introduced, much less widespread. It appeared in Europe immediately after Columbus's voyages to the New World, at the end of the 1400s, and it is thought to have mutated into an even more destructive form than it had originally been, involving catastrophic nervous system destruction, leading to insanity, paralysis, tabes dorsalis, etc.,) in the late 1700s to early 1800s. The Napoleonic wars, a/k/a the French Revolutionary wars, in the early 1800s, spread the more virulent and destructive form of the disease far and wide throughout the entirety of Europe and beyond. It was a terrible scourge throughout the entire nineteenth century and well into the twentieth.
I wonder if vaccination wrecked people's immune systems to the point that those who had been able to mount an adequate defense against diseases like tuberculosis and syphilis fell prey to their devastating effects after being vaccinated. There must have been many people who were exposed to the syphilis spirochete (e.g. the wives of men who were known to have had syphilis but never fell sick from it.) Vaccination might have devastated people's immune systems in ways that made them unable to defend themselves again the microbes they'd previously been able to keep at bay. Clara Schumann , the wife of the great romantic composer Robert Schumann, who had syphilis, (and was treated for it with toxic mercury, the only treatment used for syphilis at the time) is an example. Clara never became sick with syphilis, nor did she ever show any symptoms of it, but she must have been exposed to it. If she had been vaccinated, perhaps she would have fallen victim to the infection which her body evidently competently defended itself against.
There’s a great article about syphilis I read recently on Substack. Either Mike Stone, Unbecoming, or Roman. So much of “disease history “ has seems to have been manipulated.
I remember being told how syphilitics like Randolph Churchill were afflicted late in life by a return to the brain of the disease of their youth. Quite a bug that. Seems it could mimic the effects of heavy metal toxicity decades after its initial onslaught as love bug. Unless of course...
Similar conclusions can be reached when considering rise of AIDS morphed into HIV (to have an entity to blame not life style or other cause of immune suppression)
There is a very interesting case concerning James Phipps, Jenner's original "vaccinee", and his ultimate tubercular decline in his teens and early twenties, as related in Annie Riley Hale's 1935 book "Medical Voodoo." **
From pages 12-13 (book) or pages 19-20 (pdf):
"It is further related by historians of that period, that in May 1796, Jenner chanced upon a milk-maid named Sarah Nelmes who had contracted cowpox in the casual way, and from a pustule on her hand he took the matter with which he inoculated a small boy named James Phipps, described by the Jennerian chroniclers as "a healthy lad of eight years." This was the first authentic vaccination performed by Jenner, who thus linked with his subsequent fame the names of these two obscure individuals, and furnished another instance of Carlyle's observation: "By what strange chances do we live in history!"
"The milk-maid, Sarah Nelmes, after contributing the precious contents of her pustule, fades out of the Jennerian picture; but James Phipps, the healthy small boy, reappears later—to point the moral of another sort of vaccination tale. Eager to witness the result of his experiment, Jenner inoculated this boy with smallpox lymph two months later, and when he failed to develop smallpox, this was acclaimed as proof triumphant of the immunity conferred by the cowpox inoculation.
"This boy, James Phipps, became a sort of running targetfor the smallpox inoculators for a number of years it appears, until he died of tuberculosis in his early twenties. In Baron's Life of Jenner, (Vol. 2, p. 304), the author relates that while walking with his friend one day they passed young Phipps, when Jenner exclaimed: "Oh, there is poor Phipps! I wish you could see him. He has been very unwell lately and I am afraid he has got tubercles in his lungs. He was recently inoculated for smallpox, I believe, for the twentieth time, and all without effect!"
"This was before the vaccination experiment had gone far enough for any extended observation of the cumulative effects of repeated inoculations manifesting as other forms of disease; and it was not to be expected that the founder of the new smallpox prophylactic should tie it up with pulmonary tuberculosis as cause and effect. The jubilant note of selfgratulation in his remark to Baron reflects his perfect satisfaction that he had prevented the Phipps boy from ever contracting smallpox, a disease which Thomas Suydenham— who is accredited with being the first man to differentiate it from other eruptive fevers and give it a name—pronounced "one of the most harmless and easily controlled of diseases if it be uncomplicated with ignorant treatment by doctors and nurses."
"And—if young Phipps, having been "saved from smallpox," must have tuberculosis after that, why that was just too bad—Jenner's skirts were clear. There is no reason, however, to doubt the sincerity of Jenner's faith in the truth of his invention, bearing in mind always Bernard Shaw's dictum that "faith may be manufactured in any degree of magnitude and intensity—not only without any basis of fact or reason, but in open contradiction of both—simply by a fervent desire to believe, coupled with a personal interest in believing.""
No precautionary principle needed when you’ve got ‘the cure’, is there! Of course, I mock.
Oh I love your study - well referenced! - of the history of our great church of modern medicine… Jenner, the original quackcinator. (And people, in their ignorance, still revere his name. C’est la vie!)… The many practising doctors addressing the issues, sharing their first-hand experience, witnessing the scourges of the smallpox vaccination within the context of the not so healthy nineteenth century populations of the western world… The existence of well kept data from a handful of population centres which belies the myth that drugs and biologics saved the world.
And it underscores how shamefully our public health authorities have ignored and obfuscated data concerning the 2020s’ largest pharmaceutical trial in history, pretending there was no need, nothing to see, no reason to look.
Every time I register the significance of those graphs you include I see them in juxtaposition to the complete abandonment of scientific inquiry and ethics prevailing in 2025. But the seeds of this dysfunction have been long sown, so shouldn’t surprise anyone.
While humans may be terribly fearful of diseases, if they even exist, what should rock their socks off are the medical mafia's designed cures. Talk about a horror show.
In the quotes from previous physicians, long dead, I don't remember seeing air quality noted as a cause of disease which surprises me a bit. When coal was used for heating and cooking the buildings became thickly coated with soot. Visibility was often reduced almost to zero.
So this seems to me a cause of lung disease; on the other hand it was the coal that enabled the improvements in standard of living.
Before losing my job of over 20 years teaching chess in the Tribeca/Battery Park City section of New York City for refusing the toxic, deadly covid injections. My job randomly mandated that I start taking tuberculosis test to be able to teach after I had already worked there for 10 years having never taken a sick day. That was one of the steps on the slippery slope towards the dehumanizing covid injection mandates, the vaccine passports and the new biosecurity state.
Excellent article. Thank you.
I was surprised to read that syphilis was one of the diseases that vaccination caused. I'd thought it was purely a sexually transmitted disease. It had existed for centuries in Europe before vaccination was introduced, much less widespread. It appeared in Europe immediately after Columbus's voyages to the New World, at the end of the 1400s, and it is thought to have mutated into an even more destructive form than it had originally been, involving catastrophic nervous system destruction, leading to insanity, paralysis, tabes dorsalis, etc.,) in the late 1700s to early 1800s. The Napoleonic wars, a/k/a the French Revolutionary wars, in the early 1800s, spread the more virulent and destructive form of the disease far and wide throughout the entirety of Europe and beyond. It was a terrible scourge throughout the entire nineteenth century and well into the twentieth.
I wonder if vaccination wrecked people's immune systems to the point that those who had been able to mount an adequate defense against diseases like tuberculosis and syphilis fell prey to their devastating effects after being vaccinated. There must have been many people who were exposed to the syphilis spirochete (e.g. the wives of men who were known to have had syphilis but never fell sick from it.) Vaccination might have devastated people's immune systems in ways that made them unable to defend themselves again the microbes they'd previously been able to keep at bay. Clara Schumann , the wife of the great romantic composer Robert Schumann, who had syphilis, (and was treated for it with toxic mercury, the only treatment used for syphilis at the time) is an example. Clara never became sick with syphilis, nor did she ever show any symptoms of it, but she must have been exposed to it. If she had been vaccinated, perhaps she would have fallen victim to the infection which her body evidently competently defended itself against.
There’s a great article about syphilis I read recently on Substack. Either Mike Stone, Unbecoming, or Roman. So much of “disease history “ has seems to have been manipulated.
https://viroliegy.com/2025/05/01/the-syphilis-scam-part-1-kochs-postulates-satisfied/
I remember being told how syphilitics like Randolph Churchill were afflicted late in life by a return to the brain of the disease of their youth. Quite a bug that. Seems it could mimic the effects of heavy metal toxicity decades after its initial onslaught as love bug. Unless of course...
Well observed!
Similar conclusions can be reached when considering rise of AIDS morphed into HIV (to have an entity to blame not life style or other cause of immune suppression)
Thank you so much for your invaluable work to educate all of us regarding your research, Roman.
It’s truly heartbreaking, the degree to which humanity has been subjected to arrogant medical madness!
There is a very interesting case concerning James Phipps, Jenner's original "vaccinee", and his ultimate tubercular decline in his teens and early twenties, as related in Annie Riley Hale's 1935 book "Medical Voodoo." **
From pages 12-13 (book) or pages 19-20 (pdf):
"It is further related by historians of that period, that in May 1796, Jenner chanced upon a milk-maid named Sarah Nelmes who had contracted cowpox in the casual way, and from a pustule on her hand he took the matter with which he inoculated a small boy named James Phipps, described by the Jennerian chroniclers as "a healthy lad of eight years." This was the first authentic vaccination performed by Jenner, who thus linked with his subsequent fame the names of these two obscure individuals, and furnished another instance of Carlyle's observation: "By what strange chances do we live in history!"
"The milk-maid, Sarah Nelmes, after contributing the precious contents of her pustule, fades out of the Jennerian picture; but James Phipps, the healthy small boy, reappears later—to point the moral of another sort of vaccination tale. Eager to witness the result of his experiment, Jenner inoculated this boy with smallpox lymph two months later, and when he failed to develop smallpox, this was acclaimed as proof triumphant of the immunity conferred by the cowpox inoculation.
"This boy, James Phipps, became a sort of running targetfor the smallpox inoculators for a number of years it appears, until he died of tuberculosis in his early twenties. In Baron's Life of Jenner, (Vol. 2, p. 304), the author relates that while walking with his friend one day they passed young Phipps, when Jenner exclaimed: "Oh, there is poor Phipps! I wish you could see him. He has been very unwell lately and I am afraid he has got tubercles in his lungs. He was recently inoculated for smallpox, I believe, for the twentieth time, and all without effect!"
"This was before the vaccination experiment had gone far enough for any extended observation of the cumulative effects of repeated inoculations manifesting as other forms of disease; and it was not to be expected that the founder of the new smallpox prophylactic should tie it up with pulmonary tuberculosis as cause and effect. The jubilant note of selfgratulation in his remark to Baron reflects his perfect satisfaction that he had prevented the Phipps boy from ever contracting smallpox, a disease which Thomas Suydenham— who is accredited with being the first man to differentiate it from other eruptive fevers and give it a name—pronounced "one of the most harmless and easily controlled of diseases if it be uncomplicated with ignorant treatment by doctors and nurses."
"And—if young Phipps, having been "saved from smallpox," must have tuberculosis after that, why that was just too bad—Jenner's skirts were clear. There is no reason, however, to doubt the sincerity of Jenner's faith in the truth of his invention, bearing in mind always Bernard Shaw's dictum that "faith may be manufactured in any degree of magnitude and intensity—not only without any basis of fact or reason, but in open contradiction of both—simply by a fervent desire to believe, coupled with a personal interest in believing.""
** https://dn720006.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-medical-voodoo-hale-1935/The_Medical_Voodoo_Hale_1935.pdf
Related… https://substack.com/@romanbystrianyk/note/c-111683175
Totally. :) Thank you.
No precautionary principle needed when you’ve got ‘the cure’, is there! Of course, I mock.
Oh I love your study - well referenced! - of the history of our great church of modern medicine… Jenner, the original quackcinator. (And people, in their ignorance, still revere his name. C’est la vie!)… The many practising doctors addressing the issues, sharing their first-hand experience, witnessing the scourges of the smallpox vaccination within the context of the not so healthy nineteenth century populations of the western world… The existence of well kept data from a handful of population centres which belies the myth that drugs and biologics saved the world.
And it underscores how shamefully our public health authorities have ignored and obfuscated data concerning the 2020s’ largest pharmaceutical trial in history, pretending there was no need, nothing to see, no reason to look.
Every time I register the significance of those graphs you include I see them in juxtaposition to the complete abandonment of scientific inquiry and ethics prevailing in 2025. But the seeds of this dysfunction have been long sown, so shouldn’t surprise anyone.
While humans may be terribly fearful of diseases, if they even exist, what should rock their socks off are the medical mafia's designed cures. Talk about a horror show.
Thank you from me as well.
In the quotes from previous physicians, long dead, I don't remember seeing air quality noted as a cause of disease which surprises me a bit. When coal was used for heating and cooking the buildings became thickly coated with soot. Visibility was often reduced almost to zero.
So this seems to me a cause of lung disease; on the other hand it was the coal that enabled the improvements in standard of living.
Well done and thank you.
Very well done
So, it seems the true cause of TB remains unknown? besides being caused by vaccines that is....